Samudrala Vijaya Kumari v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal noted receipt of an appeal but identified procedural defects including delayed filing, shortfall in court fee, and missing annexures. It issued notice to the appellant to remove defects.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Regular Appeal Dy. No. 578 of 2023, Date 08/09/2023
Smt. Samudrala Vijaya Kumari & Anr. -------- Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank & Ors. ------- Respondent
Received a appeal filed online on 29/08/2023 and hard copy on 08/09/2023 by post under section 20 of the RDB Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate Mr. P. Nanda Kishore on behalf of Smt. Samudrala Vijaya Kumari & Anr., Appellant.
The appeal has been filed on behalf of Smt. Samudrala Vijaya Kumari & Anr. against the order dated 11/07/2023 passed in M.A. No. 31 of 2019 in O.A. No. 60 of 2017 in DRT,Visakhapatnam. Appeal fee with vakalatnama fee of Rs.255/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 2908230044253 dated 29/08/2023 has been paid through online along with the appeal.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Appeal is not within the period of limitation. Delay petition being I.A. No. 346 of 2023 is filed through online on 02/09/2023 and hard copy on 08/09/2023 by post with application fee of Rs.250/- vide Transaction Ref. Id. 0209230029002 dt. 02.09.2023has been paid through online.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Samudrala Vijaya Kumari & Anr.
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090005782023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court