M/s Balaji Mobile Shoppe v. Shriram Urban co-op Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fl!
|Contd Sheet
Office Notes, Appearances
. Date
| 'Office Notes, Appearances
and Reg strar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders
'ih______ _' _i__________ •________|
|---|
|■■!_
r
..|
II !
!
FARAD
debts recovery APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI Mlsc ApplicationIn No.""" ______ .of 20 I. No. Appeal No, % Of Zifa'S• Bo^qj i Shoppe , ... Appellants (Advocate f?o K a r> _C h a ncl ci ?r l^ra -tt" ) Versus SK^J-'va-ann O 0-bqh <o -OP' Sank L4-cl-
Respondents
(Advocate.
)
Date Office Notes, Appearances
_______ and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders
/}-<Av Kaht Gjcu'KvJgoI -phr- AfPeJ)^'
4H
/4^V. AmfkC pveSen-)- ‘ '
None -psT>" Ftesp&n^eJopx
A^ellonF pxdy P(ed p^(} yeaay-A^a i-A
/yP Coxt Ca^t t’O Chropbc-OCe c>r cTydcV 3rd ■
>'(91^3'
pave VeOAn.esW P(ace-
(Both -Moe- pav+ieJ.
-Pbc f^Pfec before- pori 1 b (c C- P
placed
'-[he.v'f ■feT'O Z^>ea( W 0 - 1
C ? Prr a ppv&pvfe^e o-rdcv" h> LT t*]x3,
Ht> h b k_ <
-
C C tfz>7l+a? Me c Pd
^/c R
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellants
- respondent
Respondents
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court