The Tribunal noted the appellate deposit of ₹35 lakh by the appellant and directed that the appeal be taken on file in default of defects. It was posted for hearing.
Appeal taken on file; posted for hearing before Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 1066/2022
Between
M/s. Balaji Mobile Shoppe … Appellant/s Through its Proprietor, Shri Pravin S/o Madanmohan Mishra.
V/s.
The Authorized Officer, Shriram Urban C0-op Bank Ltd. & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Amita Chaware, i/b Mr. R.H. Chandurkar, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 02/12/2022:-
As per the order of this Tribunal the Appellant has deposited the amount of ₹ 35 lakh as directed.
Therefore, the appeal is directed to be taken on the file, if there are no defects to be cured.
Post on 16.12.2022 for hearing before the Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-12
1
M/s. Balaji Mobile Shoppe
The Authorized Officer, Shriram Urban C0-op Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
