Aashok Namdeo Gaikwad v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

1
Qg^JSECOVERYAPPEUATE

Wise Application No. of 20 •
In
.‘Appeal N0, — Of 20 2/3
... Appellants
(Advocate ' ^>lk w<l A 7
J
Versus
^k®|ayV\Av^|oJoi'V^ ...Respondento
Jn <S0 -' ^-tD
(Advocate,
J
)
' ' ■— - ------ —____ —____________ j ._________ •_________ •
Data Office Notes, Appearances] '
' and Registrar's order / Chalrperaon'o Orders
^5^x3
Appeal presented , by A- - ,
Advocate for Appellant, with of] ^s.
on
older /^JhlaTorder
being aggrieved by the Impugned
passed on; in S.A. I'^tK NoJ 2J 01^20^1
by DRT?jVj .
.u/s 2Q of n.D.D.B.a I- I Acri993 ■/ 18 of
• .
S.A.R.FAILS.I. Act. 2002.
I ■
1. > Exh - 1 Appeal Memo
'I
-3/3/2^
I S.O. lor compliance (0
' I
• jJ REGISTI
•-2 SIC'S/25 Adv- Bhabhann AdtT AppjeJ Ia44~ ■
OJor\e fnTT iPespodenV. [[' tl' !
pidj PptT Corr ph'a nee X3.p3 /lb/^003
-------
—TJ__ Zl lc ■ Pg) LShzFt??r J
P.T.O.

Date	Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order/ Chairperson's Orders
13/1012(^23 Oq//2/2®23	2r' V ,ShubhQiri Pott ^PPeJlq-n^ - None ftb-zs^ Pe^-poY^J^n V - PvJv t^o-TT i^ppeJ la^b^eeK of deP^C'te , (pdj FtiTT ^mo'Vcd -H> ^of oi/^xy? q . Adv _, _Pa-QpuJ) C^ahacAiH I^b'^r A ppeiian-^ . r7or>e ResportJ'en'b - Adv. ftj2r epp^'ori seej5 Qe mcrv oJ o Aec4-. ^ovjoFd^