Kantaben Ravjibhai Patel v. Hdfc Bank

1

L

. Date	■V I V! ^n2	i- !■ ! . i .. !. and Regis tSe»?^	Office Notea**/Appearance**o 29. v t . I ; t. <. ' ■ t ' i. > <• • r - -- -'. - d a trar's order / Chairperson’s Orders *__, _ .__ __________ ^tns-	I b 1 r.) $ ’ ■ A-

MUMBAI
Miso Application No. fttM ■
P/X No. No' —223^. of 20^
Appellants
(Advocate, Ab lOu <^k4uyVej4 ? 1
Versus
a-0T ...RospondonU
|K> pc >50
(Advocate
J
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Reglstrar'a order / Chalrperson'a Ordoro
>10'-23
Appeal presented .. by
Advocate for Appellant with Of Rs. * on
. being aggrieved by the Impugned order / order
Passod o'1 in S.A. /j^A. No^e^ of2d %^
by PHT, JT; ,u/s 2X1 nf R n n.R A Pj_Aci -100,3 / 18 of
S.A.R.F.AKkl. Act. 2002.
Exh - I Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance lo 04—12 -202-3"
REGI :AR
*.
7
P.T.O.