Smt Ganduluru Nageswaramma v. Manasa Cake Wala
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench order in Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Order fixes date for hearing and allows respondent to file opposition after costs.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal Dy No. 181 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.03.2023
Smt. Gandluru Nageswaramma
… Appellant
-VsManasa Cake Wala & Anr.
… Respondents Mr. S. Chakraborty, ld. Counsel. for the appellant.
Mr. A. Pramanik, ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and Mr. R.D.Bagchi, ld. counsel for borrower.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent no.1 has not filed opposition nor served copy. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that appellant has not served copy of the paper-book. However, copy of the affidavit of service filed on 15.04.2021 indicates that memo of appeal has been served upon respondent no.1. It is a dilatory tactics on behalf of the respondent no.1. Respondent no.1’s submission that he has not received the paper-book could not be accepted.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Gandluru Nageswaramma
- respondent
Manasa Cake Wala
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court