This single-paragraph default dismissal order held that the appeal was dismissed because no party appeared to represent the appellants at the hearing on 01.03.2023.
Dismissal of Appeal No. 124 of 2016 in default; closure of pending I.A.s; vacation of interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 124 of 2016
(Arising out of O.A. 48 of 2009 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.03.2023 M/s. Prestic Laboratories Limited & Another … Appellants -Vs-
State Bank of India … Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None appears to represent the Appellants.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 124 of 2016,
stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 1st March, 2023 12/ac
M/s. Prestic Laboratories Limited & Another
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
