The Tribunal listed the appeal for hearing jointly with another appeal by the Bank. It clarified that the Bank's opposition grounds from the earlier appeal be treated as opposed in this appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 181 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
09.06.2023 Smt. Gandluru Nageswaramma … Appellant -VsManasa Cake Wala & Another … Respondents Ms. Sanchari Chakraborty with Ms. Akankhha Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Anirban Pramanick with Ms. Subhasree Poddar, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
No opposition is filed by Respondent No. 1. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2, City Union Bank Limited, submits that Respondent No. 2 has filed Appeal No. 23 of 2022 against the same judgment. The grounds made in Appeal No. 23 of 2022 be treated as opposition in this appeal.
Appeal be registered as regular appeal by providing regular appeal number.
List on 16th August, 2023 for hearing along with Appeal No. 23 of 2022.
Interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 09th June, 2023 15/ac
Gandluru Nageswaramma
Manasa Cake Wala
City Union Bank Limited
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
