Listing order for Regular Appeal No. 40/2022 regarding service of notice and time to file reply. No substantive decision recorded.
Directed appellant to file proof of service by next date; respondent granted time to file reply; case listed for service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 40/2022 Date: 10.04.2023
Bank of Baroda Vs. Sanjay Kumar and Anr.
Present: Shri Girish Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Gopal Ji Khare, counsel for the respondent no. 1,
The office report dated 06.04.2023 shows that no proof of publication has been filed by the counsel for the appellant to authenticate the service of notice upon the respondent no. 2. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 17.07.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Bank of Baroda
Sanjay Kumar
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
