Appeal allowed with condonation of delay in filing substitution application for legal heirs; case listed for hearing on restoration application.
Condonation of delay in filing substitution application for legal heirs of appellant no. 2; order for necessary substitution within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 227/2019 In Regular Appeal No. 311/2015 Date: 19.07.2023
M/s Purshottam Das Dharmendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri A. K. Singh, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Anuj Mandhyan, counsel for the respondent no. 3-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 18.07.2023 shows that the substitution application along with delay condonation application has been filed for substituting the legal heirs of the appellant no. 2.
For the reason stated in the delay condonation application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The substitution application is also allowed. Let the necessary substitution be made by the appellant in the array of parties within a week.
List this case on 08.11.2023 for hearing on the restoration application.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
M/s Purshottam Das Dharmendra Kumar & Ors.
State Bank of India & Ors.
Respondent no. 3-Auction Purchaser
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
