M S Purshottam Das Dharmendra Kumar v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 227/2019 In Regular Appeal No. 311/2015 Date: 16.05.2023
Present: Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Arun Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellants, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Anuj Mandhyan, counsel for the respondent no. 3-Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant no. 2 has expired, therefore, he seeks time to file the substitution application. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsels for the respondents submit that they do not want to file reply to the restoration application.
List this case on 19.07.2023 for restoration.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court