Smt Vemula Vyjanthi v. The Authorized Officer SBI
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata listed interim applications regarding condonation of delay and waiver of res judicata before a single judge, granting time for affidavits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 115 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 190 of 2016 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
02.01.2023
Smt. Vemula Vyjanthi & Another … Appellants -Vs-
State Bank of India & Another … Respondents
Mr. Nimani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmisha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Respondent Bank against application for condonation of delay (I.A. 76 of 2022) is taken on record.
Learned Counsel for the Appellants prays for and is granted three weeks time to file supplementary affidavit with advance copy to the Respondent. Counter, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Vemula Vyjanthi
- appellant
Another
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 191090001152022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court