Puneet Rastogi v. D. M. Lucknow and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Appeal listed for adjournment due to the absence of arguing counsel from the appellant's side, to be heard on a future date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 216/2018 Date: 18.05.2023
Puneet Rastogi Vs. District Magistrate, Lucknow & Ors.
Present: Shri Mahendra Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Swayambhoo Chandranshul, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent no. 2- Bank,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Swayambhoo Chandranshul could not come from Lucknow, therefore, he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
List this case on 28.08.2023 for hearing.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Puneet Rastogi
- respondent
District Magistrate, Lucknow
- respondent
Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court