State Bank of India v. Raj Kumar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal-listed hearing due to the indisposition of the appellant's arguing counsel, scheduling it for 27.04.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 206/2016 Date: 14.02.2023
State Bank of India Vs. Raj Kumar and Ors.
Present: Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Anuj Kshetrapal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vinay Sharma, counsel for the respondent no. 1, None for the other respondents,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Sandeep Arora is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 27.04.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Raj Kumar
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court