Bank of India v. M S Manish Trading Company
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal filed under the SARFAESI Act relating to a DRT order conditioning a sale on cash deposits was filed by the bank. The court declined to examine the grievance and disposed of the appeal without adjudicating the merits.
What did the court decide?
None; the appeal was disposed of on the direction to invoke the remedy by way of application before the Tribunal below.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 153/2023 Date: 14.02.2023
Bank of India Vs. M/s Manish Trading Company
Present: Shri P. K. Bajpai, counsel for the appellants,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
The present appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against the interim order dated 11.01.2023 passed by the DRT, Jabalpur in S.A. No. 882/2022. Vide impugned order, the sale has been affected subject to condition of deposit of Rs. 60.00 lacs, out of which Rs. 30.00 lacs by 11.02.2023 and the remaining Rs. 30.00 lacs by 11.03.2023.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that an application for recalling of the said order is being pressed by the borrower, but the first part of the order impugned has been complied with by the borrower. It is further contended on behalf of the appellant that a meager amount has been directed to be deposited by the borrower vide order impugned, although the total outstanding amount against the borrower is approximately Rs. 2.50 crores, therefore, the order impugned is not sustainable.
Be that as it may, if the appellant has any grievance against the order impugned, he may move an appropriate application raising all the grievances before the Tribunal below and there is no doubt that the Tribunal below shall consider and pass the order most expeditiously.
In view of the above, the present appeal is finally disposed off.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's appeal under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against an interim order of the DRT regarding deposit conditions in an auction sale is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Manish Trading Company
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · LD Registrar
- Order 2 — this page · Rajesh Dayal Khare
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court