The single-bench commentary orders a brief adjournment granted due to bereavement. The respondent bank notes the appeal is potentially maintainable after settlement and return of title deed but no further decision is made in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 05/2022 Date: 20.12.2023
Sudhanshu Arya Vs. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Ankit Saran, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sundeep Agrawal, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent no. 1- Bank,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that there is bereavement in the family of Shri Sundeep Agrawal, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the appeal is not maintainable as the account has been settled and entire amount due has been deposited by the borrower and title deed has been returned to him.
As prayed, list this case on 07.03.2024.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Sudhanshu Arya
Indian Overseas Bank
Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
