I C I C I Bank Limited v. Deepak Hada and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court listed the appeal for adjournment due to the indisposition of the respondent's counsel and fixed the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 18/2019 Date: 15.02.2023
I C I C I Bank Ltd. Vs. Deepak Hada and Ors.
Present: Shri Mahendra Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. K. Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondents,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondents that the arguing counsel Shri Kushal Kant is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list this case on 12.04.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak Hada and Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court