Punjab and Sind Bank v. Mr Dugimpudi Srikanth Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourning a matter already listed for hearing due to counsel unavailability in the allocated city.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD) (Dy.No.222 of 2023)
(Arising out of SA No.440/2018 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.06.2023
Punjab & Sind Bank… Appellant -Vs-
Mr. Dugimpudi Srikanth Reddy ….Respondent
Mr.Safalya Kumar B Officer of Appellant
None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
The appellant filed a memo stating that its counsel is stationed at Kolkata and could not come to Hyderabad. Hence the matter may be adjourned .
It is being observed that in most of the cases listed for hearing at Hyderabad, learned counsel for the parties are seeking adjournment on the ground that the matter relates to Kolkata and arguing counsel are stationed at Kolkata, so the matters be adjourned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab & Sind Bank
- respondent
Mr. Dugimpudi Srikanth Reddy
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court