Smt Vemula Vyjanthi v. The Authorized Officer SBI
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a DRT order was dismissed as not maintainable because the appellant failed to make the statutorily required pre-deposit before filing the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for want of pre-deposit. Copy of the order supplied to parties and forwarded to the concerned DRT.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(CAMP-HYDERABAD)
Diary No.115 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. No.190 of 2016 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.06.2023
Smt. Venula Vyjanthi & Another … Appellant
-Vs-
AO, State Bank of India ...Respondent
Mr. N. Srinivas
Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. G.P. Sharma Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Venula Vyjanthi & Another
- respondent
AO, State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court