M/S H. Shanker Bar v. Indian Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD)
(Appeal Dy.No.349 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. No.1348 of 2017 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
26.06.2023
M/s. Hari Shankar Bar … Appellant
-Vs-
Indian Bank . ….Respondent
Mr. Nemani Srinivas & Mr. D. Raghavulu Learned Counsel for Appellant None for Respondent No.1 Mr. K. Karunakar Learned Counsel for Respondents No.2 to 5 None for Respondent No.6 Mr. A. Satyanarayana for Mrs. Laxmi Chaya Learned Counsel for Respondents No.7 & 8
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
An application is moved by the Appellant for extension of time. Sufficient time has already been granted vide order dt17.04.2023. However, three weeks is granted and no more time will be granted. List on 14.07.2023. It is made clear that if the amount is not deposited, the Appeal shall be dismissed as not maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Hari Shankar Bar
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court