Regular Appeal contested as not maintainable as the impugned order was previously challenged in Appeal Sr. No. 135/2014, dismissed in 2018. Appellant sought time to argue. Appeal listed for 02.08.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 121/2018 Date: 25.04.2023
Present: Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant files proof of publication, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 states that the present appeal is not maintainable as the order under challenge before this Tribunal was already challenged in Appeal Sr. No. 135/2014, which was dismissed vide order dated 10.04.2018, which is at page no. 30 of the paper book.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to argue on the maintainability of the appeal.
List this case on 02.08.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
