Disposed
State Bank of India v. M/ S Samay Vatika and 3 Others
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/121/2018
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 121/2018 Date: 23.09.2024
State Bank of India Vs. M/s Samay Vatika and 3 Ors.
Present: Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3, Ex-parte against the respondent no. 4,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the writ petition has already been filed before the Hon’ble Patna High Court, therefore, the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
State Bank of India
M/s Samay Vatika
Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court