State Bank of India v. M/ S Samay Vatika and 3 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 121/2018 Date: 23.11.2023
State Bank of India Vs. M/s Samay Vatika and Ors.
Present: Ms. Arpita Tarmali, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondents,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
List this case on 30.01.2024 for reply.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Samay Vatika and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court