ramakrishnaiah muli v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata listed an interim application for condonation of delay. The order records procedural directions regarding representation, notice to the third respondent, and the date for further listing without disposing of the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl Dy No. 263 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
12.05.2023
Ramakrishnaiah Muli
Appellant
Vs.
State Bank of India & Ors. ….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. A. K. Dhandhania, ld.senior counsel Md. Dilawar Khan, ld. Counsel Mr. Ratul Das, ld. Counsel.
For Respondent: Mr. P. K. Mukherjee, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 192 of 2023 is filed by the appellant u/s 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. Respondent no. 1 and 2 are represented by Mr. P.K.Mukherjee, ld. Counsel. Mr. Mukherjee prays for time to file Vakalatnama. Vakalatnama be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramakrishnaiah Muli
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090002632023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court