An interim order in appeal Dy. No. 825/2022 directed the appellant to file proof of publication for service of notice. The case was adjourned for filing of reply to be filed by the next date.
Time granted to file reply; Case listed for service on 29.08.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 825/2022 Date: 16.05.2023
Present: Shri Himanshu Mishra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Abhishek Kapariya, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pradeep Dwivedi, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 15.05.2023 shows that no proof of publication has been filed to authenticate the service of notice upon the respondent nos. 2 to 6 as well as 7 & 9. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 29.08.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
1 issue framed by the court
Service of notice on respondent nos. 2 to 6 as well as 7 & 9 was unauthenticated due to lack of proof of publication.
Appellant
Respondent-Bank
R.D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
