Mr Mahabir Singh ( Since Deceased ) through LRs v. Punjab National Bank and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The learned registrar noted the presence of counsel, the filing of delay condonation application and supplementary affidavit along with authority letter. No substantive disposal or court decision is recorded in this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 825/2022
(Mahabir Singh Vs. Punjab National Bank)
Date: 04.11.2022
Shri Himanshu Mishra, holding brief of Shri Rahul Kapur, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present and files Delay Condonation Application with Court fee, and also files Supplementary Affidavit through which authority letter and certified copy of the impugned order has been filed. Defects reconciled. Proper court fee paid.
The appellant is not a borrower or guarantor. He is owner of the property. The demand notice (Page 27 of the instant appeal) does not bear name of the appellant.
The instant Application has been filed by Third Party under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against final order dated 25.08.2022 of DRT, Lucknow in S.A. No. 296/2020. Delay Condonation Application (I.A. No. 559 /2022), has been filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 14.11.2022 for admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahabir Singh
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090008252022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court