Sou Aarti M Mahadik v. Housing Development Finance Corporation Bank Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
Date
Office Notes, Appearance & Registrar's order / Chairperson's order fNorve^ Pott Pppe^ianp . po^T P- 1 £r pd*^ • j <ar\Q CAP* c^o/zre 'Q- -SutbrYA \ "b-Pco/ pd%/£)CdJ-€ fb'TS" R- P< No '“<2“ VKdJ- ResP^^4PD V^DPC PC ec,n,< Pd^J^ezrvj'c-e aiPPJflVi]pppe) Icin-b , jpe-zr APC'«d/< '— \r\ V+\«. 'Q' l^P~-2 by geTT^iCe \S P<3 ^yo.g'ecl P>o5+7®' <• 4-o 4-aJ<-e_ pppjJlcJ/X^- >-S d'T-a^ <<> . Ar, S^TV^ noH c« a1 ddso W19p6 jGdnk r>i^c^ s+-^ P - 1 Ac •
k
r->ahad;k InpertonCAodhaQTNo^mmeSiaJft-t Ad^- Sa^ar>CK<3ihO3Q'*r< P^r |3~\2<1Q-Q. _■ L_ > PppxiBcwP £eeP H'me 'ZPPcU’< "N5 K- TT€ CO?rd . bTyxng VApFC Ga^k ©n '- ia IQ.OQ.3- fXdj PoTT^A-ep-S 'to TT/c.ip^Cshrtn^ /
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
' AJ®- 3^ /2-a2_3
LA. NO. : OF 20 Diary No of In Diary No.:OF 20
(Advocate
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court