The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, heard an application for restoration of an appeal dismissed for default. The Tribunal ordered restoration subject to deposit of costs.
Appeal No. 14/2012 restored, subject to deposit of Rs. 10,000/- with DRT Bar Association within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson M.A. No. 36/2023 (Restoration)
In
(Regular Appeal No. 14/2012-Dismissed)
Between
Sou Aarti M Mahadik & Anr.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Housing Development Finance Corporation …Respondent/s Bank Ltd. & Ors.
-: Order dated: 21/08/2026: -
Present as under:
Mr. Milind Kashinath Mahadik, Appellant No. 2, appeared in person. Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Counsel for Respondent No. 1 & 2.
No representation for other Respondents despite repeated calls.
He would submit that the Applicant No. 1 was not keeping well and the Applicant No. 2 , Mr. Milind Mahadik, is the husband of Applicant No. 1 and was looking after her throughout her illness therefore, he could not appear before the Tribunal, consequently, Appeal No. 14/2012 was dismissed.
1
She would further submit that Applicant has made a false statement in the affidavit therefore the application is misconceived and waste.
Sd/Chairperson
VKC-15
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed in Regular Appeal No. 14/2012 be restored after the earlier dismissal for non-appearance.
Sou Aarti M Mahadik & Anr.
Housing Development Finance Corporation Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Vivek Bharti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
