Icici Bank Limited v. Parekh Aluminex Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
An index entry only; the provided text is a fragmented scanning of case metadata with no substantive judgment to extract.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order/ Chairperson’s Orders |
|
|---|---|---|
| \3/05/20<23 | _-XI C- _{s-hrct-zr Adv - CAancl?resh pao Pott App-dlo^K < 'Po'tt Respond A<dvoCaJ-e P&TT Appel Id nV £ed< 4i'rr> < Pd^S'e'Trvi'oe qPPfJavfp. Adj’ Pott se-Tr-Mfee to |
J |
| 0/n /Q023 | 7 Adv -TnckrajeeV De^hnnuukh lAc^r- P\ppeAkvnV- ‘ pjovxe Po'TT iQes'ipondeo'^ t Adv- Co?r AppeJ)ar\V seek (W \iri3 S’e-^i'ce apPfcJavi’V' f p,Jj Pott pos / AppearanceR.ep\y '2e’/^<2-^0'2^3 |
7 |
3 Mo
FARAD
DEBTS_RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUM BAI
Mlsc ApplicationIn No. “ _________ of ' 20 I. No.
Appeal No. .of 20
-" 5<S2-) <2e>2-3
X<^TL C-3. Q.<^c'uv ...Appellants
(Advocate V\A?y<y
}
Versus
...Renpondents
A^YhSy\€C< J-4A OTrS'
(Advocate.
J
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order I Chairperson's Orders
’’ TransfeP^Hetition
filed by ,
Advocate for appe fttyj/ith IPO of Rs. 250/^oTr^ . to
transfer pending beft^ DRT
to
b^-A<lv
0>S <“ S’ 1 <2>$r
^94
All «hjeGtons have Mea Complied with heMG me-
abovefewigNo., Sw<.—
BfiwIS .. -r—7
»WiltonCTV
- ^g^WDRA-T ^0/
e^rr^i l/'^
pirtDwj" '
~T^-P- ■
{^(23^ -
ffrS ,
' P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court