Sou Aarti M Mahadik v. Housing Development Finance Corporation Bank Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ii
I
FARAD
i
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
PW ' /V®- /!2e>23
? l.A.NO. : OF 20 C iary No of
In
Diary No.:OF 20
Xau ■ #8/^' A? • /Y)r
Appellants
5.
?
(Advocate
Versus
I
Respondents
(Advocate
I ! _____________ (
Date Office Notes, Appearance
& Registrar's o(rder / Chairperson's order
^0^23
^hr\ /(/c'Lii'rd . ^)dlaK>d~
I
U a*
f
zi ^5y^/2®23.
pO9/ ‘Z'-C20^
/
!
1^' r^ckhad fl< C Aodhaa'zs' rVo - 6o2>
g^-tSSl'i) APP^nENoa i n
pe^zrSo^' . J
rvc^e
Pdvocok seek Aor
Pi' I {rxg ^e<zrv i ce p £ A cl ax/ (< /
Pdj Po7r Po.5 y Wpp-ec ?ran<-c /z&epk^ +0'2/03
V&t/'zr
Date
Date Office Notes, Appearance & Registrar's order / Chairperson's order I <2/03 [|or\e_ Pott Pppdian^ . Po-zr R- 1 kq-'S- . pxcK' • ^c\nj <3 r\Q <S\ h o-'zr^ <2_ ^JubbTiX \ _~~^~CaJ_ fs»d>/OCdLhe P - 9< PesporxJ'eP'^ 0 ~ <n e'o^ ed ^X^;wx pofc Gctnl< p,’ \eal SCTTN i c-e. o '"h" pppehcmA■ sero^^6- \rx a-v\£. '^ste+'TS - --, iQ- 1 Co^pVeJ-^ Up° se'7r^'c^ <s 1 1 - eJ-e <AP P<3 x nCor^p1yo-C^d Ipo.^'k^’ o -ktl< ^ujo S'-K V“(A ^ q p> o r\ P 3 Atj sptt v J-L ^^sJl-xOHCC ^■e^'C-^. aJgo Ji-zr<^d UDP6 J9drxk IS oA sA-^ p - ) * pi)^—
^.(vr.MncJ r^ahad.'k inpe^on CAadhoQ^rrx/o • 60^9.^63»O Ad^ SarAontxGi^osa^ PrJTT R-Q. (23A£eek hW Pto'trVcU'Treco'inJtoTSxrvg HPFC^GaiHk on <2^/12 /2023fxdj ftyzrSVeps TIC .^l'5hq-zr. Ihe Regisvat is on Leave, Hence, the Board is Discharged ) f21'20'23 SO For^xe^___ to j2aJQ£^2iL. Registrar (l/c)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court