Mahendra Singh Tomar v. Catholic Syrian Bank Limited and 4 Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 198/2022 Date: 13.01.2023
Mahendra Singh Tomar Vs. Catholic Syrain Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Present: None for the appellant, Shri Bablu, Advocate holding brief of Shri Supriy Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Amit Sonkar, counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 12.01.2023 shows that pursuant to the earlier order dated 31.10.2022, learned counsel for the appellant has not taken steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 5.
Let the steps be taken within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 5 as per earlier order dated 31.10.2022 of this Tribunal. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date. If steps are not taken, appropriate order shall be passed on the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser submits that on account of concealment of correct fact, interim order has been passed in favour of the appellant. Learned counsel shall inform the counsel for the appellant about the order passed today in writing within 48 hours.
List this case on 03.02.2023 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mahendra Singh Tomar
- respondent
Catholic Syrain Bank Ltd.
- appellant
Respondent-Auction Purchaser
- respondent
Respondent-No. 5
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 091090001982022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court