Indian Bank v. M/S Jai bala ji Minerals and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal granted an adjournment in the appeal filed by Indian Bank due to the unavailability of its arguing counsel, Shri A. K. Srivastava, before fixing a new date for reply.
What did the court decide?
Case listed on 05.12.2023 for reply.
What the court decided
M.A. No. 04/2022 in Appeal Dy. No. 50/2021 Date: 19.09.2023
Indian Bank Vs. M/s Jai Bala Ji Minerals and Anr.
Present: Shri Rajneesh Kesharwani, Advocate holding brief of Shri A. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent no. 1,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri A. K. Srivastava is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
As prayed, list this case on 05.12.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indian Bank
- respondent
M/s Jai Bala Ji Minerals and Anr
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090000502021
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court