Arun Pratap Singh v. Indian Bank and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order allows appellant counsel time to file rejoinder and lists matter for 07.12.2023; no substantive decision rendered.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to file rejoinder by the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 852/2022 Date: 18.09.2023
Arun Pratap Singh Vs. Indian Bank & Anr.
Present: Shri Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri K. Kartikeya, counsel for the appellant, Shri A. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant further seeks time to file rejoinder. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 07.12.2023. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arun Pratap Singh
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090008522022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court