Kachru Hariba Jadhav v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The text is unreadable image content containing only headers and formatting code for a DRT appeal application involving a bank; no substantive judgment is present. Unable to extract issues, acts, or reasoning.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A
...
---------- : : ! || |
sjepio s.uosjedJieqo / jepjo sjejjeiBey pue
eiea
seouejeeddy’seiON 0OUJO|
;eeqs piuoq
it
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
Mlsc Applicationin ” No. __ of 20 I. No.
Appeal No. __of 20 T■ 5^5/s 0'^-3
pr\i- r)o ' I '23 I 'SO .
L<ac_K?ru Ha^bcA "Jadhav .
...Appellants
(Advocate l\ |'
)
Versus
Bank rnahq'^ras'hV&r| , Respondents
(Advocate.
Date Office Notes, Appearances
_______ Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders
4|[^],23. V f<sl-7cJ Tcv-o, be, J?vei€rr| 4^>el(a^b
hlov^e o nc| en A
kkr»-’Q
(/f Cs- Sa^~l G>—
A^f ,f£vJF f>e£^u^’6c-'^ Cj/ -fe> 5) (f
XLi
P.T.O.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lakhu
- appellant
Jadhav
- respondent
Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court