Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia v. Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 269/2022(Stay)
In Appeal No. 89/2022
Between
Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia … Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Rohit Gupta,i/b Ms Rachna Waghmare, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Nalini Lodha, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Ms Drishti Gudhaka, i/b M/s Dhruve Liladhar & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 20/12/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 seeks adjournment.
Adjourned to 07.02.2024 for further hearing along with connected appeals.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court