The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal in Appeal No. 45/2023 before the DRT Mumbai as withdrawn by the appellant via a false prayer, and dismissed interlocutory applications as infructuous.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Interlocutory applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 45/2023
Between
Daljit Singh Tirath Singh Gurudatta & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Kalpana Udykant Surana & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Vishal S Tambe, i/b Mr Vijay V Chandavale Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr. V. Deshpande, i/b M/s V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated: 20/12/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants has filed a pursis
seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
The appeal is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
mks-28
Sd/Chairperson
1
Daljit Singh Tirath Singh Gurudatta & Anr.
Kalpana Udykant Surana & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
