Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai adjourned Appeal No. 89/2022 on preliminary submissions. Reply submissions were directed to be filed before being posted for hearing on 08.08.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 89/2022
Between
Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda & 5 …Respondent/s Ors.
Mr. Rohit Gupta along with Ms. Mumtaz Khan, i/b Ms. Rachana Waghmare, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Nalini Lodha, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. G. R. Kinkhabwala along with Mr. Sriraj Menon, Mr. Dhruv Dave and Mr. Dinesh Shewani, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
-: Order dated: 01/08/2022:-
Herd preliminary submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.
Reply, if any, shall be filed with an advance copy to the other
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court