Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia v. Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 269/2022 In Misc. Appeal No. 89/2022
Between
Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia … Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Ors. …Respondent/s Ms Nalini Lodha, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr Charles D’Souza along with Mr Darshan Mehta and Ms Drishti Gudhaka, i/b M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 21/02/2023:-
Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant in part.
Post on 16.03.2023 for further hearing.
rm-15
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Reenaben Vikrambhai Patadia
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court