Jai Brijmohan Niketan Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. v. Idfc First Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
*
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI " jT" ' 3* ----- - - I.A. NO. : OF 20 6 Diary No of In Diary No.: li<^o OF 20 22— {Joa • Appellants ( Advocate ' Versus f ' ! : ' Respondents i (Advocate Date Office Notes, Appearance rd|r / Ch< irperson's order _ _____________, & (Registrar's *. on J. » t ' M)J i ^Cchid yiAaitlJ ' £ &Aw^?V<Z. /^SQ( prutOMfW^ckLf A’ **'i_ ‘ j** i ^5^ FAp-p-^ iar»-l—, P<j (JLS^O (Ale-olmoU- A^-v^l?o' , Cfxzr A fxfiorve ft's" G 'kixk' py ’ kJ ^e-zrVfce ci p^x/o^oJ^- Ape ic .e i_s pe'zr ^^pleFe upon I s
P.T.O.
|Date
2g/0g/2o»|•ZT
Office Notes, Appearance
& Registrar's order / Chairperson's order
px3v •
/ f^Td ^-c\ vAjPP-^Vq.a-v—
-to \3 /|0 /'2.0Q3 .|
|---|---|
|\3/05^<«3|ppfjdvi'4-
yQ by
on /?■* 2 t)<j
Adv< HCjKv, f^oVa fb^r Appe^lan’b.
(None ftiTJ' iQe^pondenP -
Pidv- fb-zr App-eJIar-vf
g'ezrA/ice
of ip-i cJ _V •
Ps pezr sezr-/i'ce a;
co^pl^e upon
kxanJ •c)e,live'53 Up
_harvol dleli'ye?>3 •
P3J H<zr nppeerzrcince i^eply./vP
op p-1
R-'Z-+® 06/ 1'27'2^-23.|
|05/ nl'ZCTZ:|zjc- _’c?egi£+3-t?'a
ZT_I C ■ Peg lifts-?? ■ffT._
_P,3v HeHi mo+e* fc-zr AppeJ lanV -
rxiovse fttr pesponf nb-
prJJ FdtT AppM^^1^' VP^ pepJ
p', _Ft -n. _■ +» 31/0 > /'2.°'^z4 '|
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court