Bank of Baroda v. Mansa Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
> B ■ r : i • ' > • '. “—:—
Wise Application No..
In . __ of 20 IJNo.
Appeal No. :
__ of 20 1*^-
(3ani< of Qa'&oJ a ... Appellants
(Advocate, lA/gI i ni Lncl k rt .
J
Versus
P^an s’q Sy n 4-h e PV4- • L4^^^®8pondonte
(Advocate, k.f.
_________ I ___
•L bate Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chairperson’s Orders
In compliance with the
order dated lo/^/zbalj passed
by the Hon'ble Chairperson i!n
I.A. No<427/25 the Appellant
hae carried out amendment in
the matter on 24/b^202^
. 11 -
3
S
fe
<25/0g/2oS Pick/ • rNcdk i Lojkq llft-zr sX pp^Jl an+-
a p^O^e Pfe-3-
, m i ++<J ki oJ~
'I • pcNoCO-kc R’TS' pppibl aij*',
appeoJ
Vh(£ ' •
{r
D«'T .
"jrxezre 1
s^
ppli n , I
‘farce -Vd
. : rXcVj’ Qnr Corrpli
P.T.O.
I
Contd Sheet
| Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders |
|---|---|
| Q-4lOg /2.O23 | •XtC-Pegis, (Mv- AJab'ni Lodhq Po-zr Appefla^hl None Fqtt/P^spo^denh - M*ioca><r (W **fVpp€)’a'r'V **seel< >Yxlcfe-^aJ PMoplicaJ-ton , |
| 31/ 10/2003 05/V^/2^23 |
os/n/ <202.3_._ "IK F\3v .P^osezr A K^ndeTr Ap p^Alq -K , fNo^ ftnr (Pespo.nck^- ^^d^cjcU se^ ^nne fX’ppViCouHon - edv .keJ-H; Pe.'ZT AipiP-eJlan4- . rMowe *=W Respond FXc^. Pott AppeJio^ ^eeJ-< tjj iHxd?ra<j3GL |
| f |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court