Disposed
Dr Matuk Nath Choudhary v. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. and 3 Ors.
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 955/2022 Date: 24.11.2023
Dr. Matuk Nath Choudhary Vs. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3- HUDCO,
The office report dated 23.11.2023 shows that the notice sent to the respondent no. 4 has returned back with endorsement “insufficient address” and no reply has been filed by the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3. Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date. The served respondents may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 22.02.2024 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Dr. Matuk Nath Choudhary
Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court