This order grants an adjournment to the appellant for service of notice on respondent no. 4 and allows respondents time to file their reply. The case is listed for service. No decision on merits or substantive relief is rendered.
Time granted for reply and service of notice; case listed for service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 955/2022 Date: 10.05.2023
Present: Shri Ramesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3- HUDCO,
The office report dated 09.05.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents-HUDCO and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the appellant for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4.
Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he may be permitted to take steps within a week for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4 as per earlier order dated 17.03.2023.
Ordered accordingly. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 02.08.2023 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant time for filing reply and service of notice on respondent no. 4.
Whether to list the case for service of notice.
Appellant
HUDCO
Respondent no. 4
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
