Ch Manju v. Recovery Officer Drt II Hyderabad
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against DRT-II Hyderabad order filed with procedural defects including deficit court fee, unauthenticated annexures, missing waiver application, and unsigned memorandum. Appellate Tribunal recorded defects and remitted matter for correction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Regular Appeal Dy. No. 249 of 2023, Date 19/04/2023
Smt. Ch. Manju -------- Appellant
Versus
The Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Hyderabad & 2 Ors. ------- Respondent
Received an appeal filed online on 11/04/2023 under section 20(1) of the RDDB Act, 1993 presented on behalf of Smt. Ch. Manju. Hard copy of the application is received on 19/04/2023 by post.
The appeal has been filed on behalf of Smt. Ch. Manju against the order dated 16/03/2023 passed in RAIR. No. 1370 of 2022 in O.A. No. 100 of 2008 in DRT-II, Hyderabad. Application fee along with vakalatnama fee of Rs.250/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 1104230068429 dated 11/04/2023 has been paid through online along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Application is within the period of limitation.
On scrutiny following defects are mentioned:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Ch. Manju
- respondent
The Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Hyderabad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090002492023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court