Ch Manju v. Recovery Officer Drt II Hyderabad
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. Dy. No. 249 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
17.08.2023
Smt. Ch. Manju
… Appellant Vs. The Recovery Officer,DRT 2 Hyderabad & Ors
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Apyeun Gopal, l d. counsel. Mr. Ch. Veda Vani, ld. Counsel.
For Respondent : Mr. Swapan Kr. Roy, ld. Counsel Mr. S. Agarwal, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. At the very outset learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is prepared to make payment of dues which has been stated in the counter affidavit affirmed by Mr. P. Ablaham George, Manager of respondent bank and filed before DRT-II Hyderabad wherein there is an admission that Rs.45.00 lakh is the due in respect of the appellant. It is further submitted that appellant is mortgager to the extent of the property mortgaged by her for securing the loan of the borrower. She is not a personal guarantor.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Ch. Manju
- respondent
The Recovery Officer, DRT 2 Hyderabad
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090002492023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court