Canara Bank v. Meena Oberoi and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 170/2020 Date: 15.03.2023
Canara Bank Vs. Meena Oberoi & Ors.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri O. P. Tripathi, counsel for the respondent no. 1, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
The office report dated 14.03.2023 shows that proof of publication with regard to the service of notice upon the respondents no. 2 & 4 has been filed, but till date no vakalatnama has been filed on their behalf. The delay condonation application is pending consideration.
Learned counsels for the appearing respondents seek time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The respondent nos. 2 & 4 may also put in appearance and file reply by the next date.
List this case on 24.05.2023 for reply.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Meena Oberoi
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090001702020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court