Sanjeev Shriya v. Corporation Bank and 4 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 102/2020 Date: 14.03.2023
Sanjeev Shriya Vs. Corporation Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file rejoinder to the reply of the respondent-Bank. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent nos. 2 to 5 are proforma respondents, therefore, there is no need to serve the notice upon them.
List this case on 25.05.2023 for rejoinder.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sanjeev Shriya
- respondent
Corporation Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court