Canara Bank v. Meena Oberoi and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The National Company Law Tribunal listed the appeal for reply on 28.08.2023 at the instance of the appellant, noting absence of respondent no. 2 and 4.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 170/2020 Date: 24.05.2023
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri O. P. Tripathi, counsel for the respondent no. 1, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the respondent nos. 2 & 4 have already been noticed, but none has put in appearance on their behalf. Let the served respondents file reply by the next date.
List this case on 28.08.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anupam
- respondent
Respondent no. 1
- respondent
Respondent no. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090001702020
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court