Single judge appellate bench dismissed an appeal as infructuous because the underlying interim order merged with a final order already decided by the Tribunal.
The present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Appeal 13/2022 Date: 21.12.2023
State Bank of India Vs. Priyanka Priyadarshini and Ors. Present: Shri Jitendra Sarin, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal has been filed against the interim order dated 19.04.2021, which has now merged with the final order, by which the Appeal No. 05/2021 has been decided finally by the Tribunal below, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
State Bank of India
Priyanka Priyadarshini and Ors.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
