Bank of Baroda v. Sahu Flour Pisayi Kendra and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for reply. Notices issued to respondents. One respondent appeared and sought time; appellant filed affidavit of service. Other respondents required to file reply.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 172/2023 Date: 19.05.2023
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant,
Pursuant to the earlier order of this Court dated 27.02.2023, notices were issued, but the office report dated 17.05.2023 shows that no affidavit of service has been filed to authenticate the service of notice upon the respondents.
Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and prays for time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed affidavit of service and has stated that all the respondents have been served, but the other respondents have not put in appearance, who may do so and file reply by the next date.
List this case on 01.09.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent nos. 1 to 4
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090001722023
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court