Anupam Bhartiya v. Tata Capital Housing and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjourned order directing appellant to serve notices on absent respondents and where possible by publication in newspapers.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 786/2022 Date: 02.05.2023
Present : Ms. Utkarshni Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sahil Srivastava, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2- F.I.
None for the respondent no. 8-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 01.05.2023 shows that notices sent to the respondent nos. 3 to 7 have returned back with endorsement “addressee has left without instruction”. The said report further shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 8. The said respondents may file reply by the next date.
Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 3 to 7 by publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 10.08.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Unspecified Appellant
- respondent
Unspecified Respondents 1 & 2 (F.I.)
- respondent
Unspecified Respondents 3 to 7
- respondent
Unspecified Respondent 8 (Auction Purchaser)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090007862022
- Topic
- Contempt of Court
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court